rss Email Wireless
 

Did Intrust Arena humiliate woman with service dog?

Reported by: Craig Andres
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 2/03 6:10 pm

Wichita, Kansas - A Hutchinson woman is filing paperwork to sue Intrust Arena after she says she was humiliated for bringing her service dog to the arena for a recent hockey game.

"I was at the game and we were enjoying it," says Angie Lewis-Thomas. "First period and my dog Quairvo, he kind of had to go to the bathroom. I asked which door to exit and re-enter with my service dog."

When she came back inside, Angie says she was humiliated.

"That supervisor says to me, "Why did you bring your pet to the arena?'"

Angie says the questions did not stop, even after she explained it was a service dog providing medically necessary guidance for Angie's symptoms related to blood sugar levels and panic attacks.

"She asked if the dog was absolutely necessary," says Angie. "Then she asked for paperwork. She said she had to see paperwork from a doctor saying the dog was necessary. I was humiliated in front of all those people. She didn't even bother to pull me aside to a private area to ask the questions. She just kept after me right there in front of everyone. I was humiliated. It's just wrong."

Intrust Arena gave an official response, saying they have talked to Angie about the incident.

"In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act," reads the statement, "INTRUST Bank Arena allows our guests to bring service animals into our facility.  Per the regulation, a public entity is allowed to ask if the animal is required because of a disability and what work or task the animal has been trained to perform.  SMG trains it staff in accordance with ADA regulation."

Legal analysts say in order for a lawsuit to have merit in a case like this, the person with the service dog or service animal must prove they were questioned beyond what is permitted by law.

"Two questions to ask if a dog qualifies as a service animal," says Legal analysts Dan Monnat. "One: Is the animal necessary for a disability? Two: What work or task is the animal trained to perform? But much beyond that runs the risk of discriminating against the person with disabilities or risking the release of private, confidential medical information."

Angie says the questions just kept coming.

"And I said he's a service dog that's all I need to say," explains Angie. "And she said well, do you have paperwork from a doctor? I want an apology. Yes, I'm going to file a lawsuit but I'm not after money. I just want them to be held accountable."

Angie says she is talking with several lawyers to see who is best qualified to take the case.

Share
25 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

ivagotzau - 2/9/2012 5:09 AM
1 Vote
Smithcat, Thanks for be supportive of this young lady. These service animals don't have to wear id tags or vests per the ada. Because it can bring decrimination. BUT, this dog did have his red jacket on and harness that night and was well behaved, quite, didn't cause a fuss.

ivagotzau - 2/9/2012 5:00 AM
1 Vote
Not4You2Know, First of all you don't knoe ANYTHING abouth service dogs!!! They CAN detect changes in blood sugar, epilepsy, panic attacs, anxiety attacks, PTSD, help with Autism, OCD, Balance Issues and much more. So, until you done your research on these things better to be quiet then run your pie hole and prove your an uneducated fool. If you watched Craig's article you would knoe what the dog was trained for.

ivagotzau - 2/9/2012 4:43 AM
1 Vote
Crabbyerin, A service dog is a very well behaved, extremely smart dog. You can tell them from somes ordinary household untrained pet. Now then, maybe one day they will start selling brain cells for people on the internet.

ivagotzau - 2/9/2012 4:30 AM
1 Vote
Antisocial, Not everybody is GREEDY LIKE you! Word is she will ask that full page appollogies in certain newspapers and on the news will be her requests. Money isnt the only way to hurt a business, theres runining their reputation which is worse and they are already doing that on their own.

Antisocial - 2/6/2012 7:18 PM
0 Votes
noangellawyer...I know you can't read...but I'll try again. I said that IBA doesn't care about accountability..which is what she wants..acountability. Fine..she and IBA will go to court..she wins..she gets an " our sincerest apologies" from the people at IBA. Hell they might even make the bad woman apolgize too. Personally I don't think IBA would really be all that sincere...it's just mouthing words and they'll do it because saying I'm sorry is easier on the pocket book. But for me? I don't care about the words..I want your MONEY..because taking the MONEY is how to hurt a business. Companies are in business to take the customers money and to make money. If all she wants is accountability...more power to her..get it in writing and done publicly. But for me? I want MONEY because I don't beleive that an apology would be meant whole-heartedly. Do you get me now?

Smithcat - 2/6/2012 3:04 PM
2 Votes
KZnVC, Why should a disabled user of a service dog have to show an "Official Approved Government ID" simply to do the same things that you do without having to show one? THAT is why it is discriminatory.....requiring someone to do something that no one else has to do simply because of the mitigating use of a service dog. The "Disabled Placard" argument is invalid because no one has the "right" to drive; it is a privilege extended by the State in which one resides after one has passed the associated requirements to drive and obtained proof of disability from a physician. The US Constitution protects the rights of all free citizens, disabled or otherwise, to go about their normal business in the public venue without having to produce some form of "Official Approved Government ID" to anyone who asks. Having to require a disabled user of a service dog to produce some sort of "ID" upon request just to go about their normal business IS discriminatory in that NO OTHER FREE CITIZEN has to produce one to go about their normal business. Are you unable to see the difference? Or shall we just affix a Yellow Star on all our clothing so you and your Gestapo will leave us alone? Frankly, your suggestion of an identification card which singles out the disabled users of service dogs is most disturbing, as it clearly demonstrates that you view the disabled users of service dogs as second class citizens who somehow need a government ID just to be present in the public venue. Yes, very disturbing indeed. Some review by you of what basic human rights are under the law and what the US Constitution states is very much in order.

not4you2know - 2/5/2012 6:11 PM
0 Votes
That dog haw some awful walking on leash for being a "service dog." Service dogs also cannot predict panic attacks, as they are triggered by something in the environment. The dog doesn't know you'll encounter the trigger any sooner than the handler does. Even diabetic alert dogs are questionable in their actualy ability to detect varying blood sugar levels. True, she doesn't have to show proof of training or disability for public access. But if she expect to stand a chance in court she'd better have that very same paperwork in order. I'd be interested in knowing if the dog came from a program, or if she trained it herself. Maybe I'm soured from bad experiences. But after seeing a number of fake "service dogs" including a big black spaniel INSIDE a shopping cart at Wal-Mart barking at shoppers - and nothing being done about it - the number of fake service dogs or poorly trained service dogs is becoming quite a problem. Those of us with legitimate service dogs ARE being hurt by fake service dogs. It will be interesting to see what comes of this - what exactly happened, where the dog was trained, what tasks it actually is TRAINED to do, etc. I hope we get some updates as things progress.

crabbyerin - 2/4/2012 11:32 PM
0 Votes
Anyone can buy service animal vests online. That doesn't prove anything.

noangellawyer - 2/4/2012 12:43 PM
0 Votes
Colorcoded, The womanam you speak of aqnd don't know I'm sure, is NOT thin-skinned or whiny. You don't probably even know she spoke with the Mngr. at IBA and he would have his female emloyee appologize for breaking all the ADA laws and that is why the lady has taken it a step further. There would be no ACLU if people had a common sense brain cell in their head but that would be to much to ask.

noangellawyer - 2/4/2012 12:31 PM
1 Vote
KZnVC, Have you ever heard it is better to be quite & let people think your stupid then open your mouth & prove them right? It isn't discrimination, it is called privacy. Before you start talking about what should be required to get a service ANIMAL maybe you should read up on the laws about it.
KSN News Poll
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.