rss Email Wireless
 

Group turns in petitions against hotel development

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 12/06/2011 12:00 am
WICHITA, Kansas -- Americans for Prosperity turning in stack petitions at the Wichita City Clerk's Office Monday afternoon.

The group is against a tax subsidy for a downtown Wichita hotel development.

The group says it has about 3,500 signatures which is enough to send the issue to a public vote or force the city to rescind the ordinance.
WICHITA, Kansas (KSN) - After two months of circulating petitions, the Wichita chapter of Americans For Prosperity is confident it will have the required amount of signatures to send a tax subsidy for a hotel developer to a vote.

How far that will go in overturning the subsidy is still unknown.

The group held a celebration of sorts Sunday.  It was a final push for petition organizers to get as many signatures as possible.  

“I'm hoping today that we get enough numbers here to present to the city to get this stopped,” said Denmon Underwood, who signed the petition.

He is one of a few thousand adding his name to a petition to overturn about $2 million in tax subsidies for the developers of the future Ambassador Boutique Hotel being built in  downtown Wichita.

"The developer himself needs to put the money up front, instead of putting it on the backs of people,” said Underwood.

Part of the agreement between the city and developers calls for the hotel to retain 75 percent of a hotel guest tax for 15 years.

Organizers need just over 2,500 signatures as a step in overturning that, and the group has met the required number.

“There's a lot of resistance to these big tax payer giveaways that the city council has done,” said Bob Weeks, a petition organizer.

Nothing is set in stone as to that subsidy being overturned.  The signatures will have to be verified, and not all names will be valid.

“They sign and then you see they live in Haysville or something like that,” Weeks said.  “Some people don't want to admit they are not registered to vote so they go ahead and sign.”

Still, organizers are confident they have more than enough signatures, and say they'll continue to get them up until the petition is turned in.

Meanwhile, developers say they'll have their own campaign to counter the petition.

They believe Americans For Prosperity members are misinformed about the tax money.  They say it will come from hotel guests, not Wichita tax payers.

“Does Wichita want the jobs?  Do they want the additional tax revenue coming in?  And do they want the amenities in their downtown area?” questioned Paul Coury, a hotel developer.

Share
6 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

RationalKansan - 12/5/2011 8:05 PM
0 Votes
I have first-hand knowledge of the finances of the (city-owned) Hyatt and it is a huge profit-maker. They have 95% - 100% occupancy nightly (often having to send guests to other downtown hotels because they are full); and banquets and conferences are booked solid. This would be an excellent investment for the city and there is definitely demand for rooms and venues that a second hotel would provide. Also, Hyatt employees several hundred workers. But leave it to "Americans for Prosperity" more like "Americans for Serfdom" to once again be small-minded in their self-interest rather than having an interest in the greater good.

kawwsu77 - 12/5/2011 5:41 PM
0 Votes
Where is the Americans for Prosperity and Bob Weeks' petition against the subsidy to Bombardier? I guess Bob just only likes city, county, and state money going to certain businesses and not others.

MJ Profanity - 12/5/2011 12:15 PM
0 Votes
Rob from the poor to give to the rich. I've not seen enough to see where the petition groups are. I'd sign, but I can't think my good intentions to get my name to the list.

RickCharles - 12/5/2011 10:50 AM
0 Votes
Our fine city government at work. The City already owns the hotel managed by the Hyatt. If there's such a market demand for downtown hotels, then why doesn't the City sell the one they currently own, instead of subsidizing another hotel that's not needed?

JustaGuy - 12/5/2011 1:04 AM
0 Votes
Damn Koch brothers telling everyone what is right... NOT!

JustaGuy - 12/5/2011 1:03 AM
0 Votes
Does it really matter if it is coming from my pocket as a local tax-payer, or from people visiting from out of state? It's still individuals funding a commercial enterprise that should support itself. If it's not economically feasible without playing Robin Hood with other people's money, then don't build the darn thing!
KSN News Poll
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.