rss Email Wireless
 

KS abortion insurance bill lives again, passes

Reported by: Craig Andres
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 5/13/2011 7:29 pm

Topeka, Kan. - A controversial proposal in Kansas to restrict private health insurance for abortions has passed and is expected to be signed into law by Governor Brownback.

The measure prohibits insurance companies from automatically covering abortions in their health plans, except to save a woman's life. Individuals and employers wanting the coverage would have to buy separate abortion-only policies.

Some legal analysts say the measure could be challenged.

"This Kansas legislation has to be examined for unconstitutional gender discrimination in violation of the equal protection clause," explains legal analyst Dan Monnat. "The Kansas legislature has singled out a medical procedure that only a woman can need and then cut off access to it based solely on emotional, religious and political considerations."

Lawmakers who voted in the bill call it a fair measure.

"We also succeeded in passing legislation (HB 2075) that will, among many other amendments to the Insurance Code, provide for optional insurance coverage through riders for certain abortions, if an individual feels compelled to acquire such coverage," explains Republican Dennis Hedke of Wichita. "Pro-life advocates were also likely pleased to learn that state monies will no longer be expended to provide insurance coverage to state employees seeking an abortion, unless the procedure is necessary to protect the life of the mother."


Kansans for Life, a group that is strongly opposed to abortions, is calling this a big win.

"And abortion is not health care, so I'm glad that they just took that out of there," says David Gittrich of Kansans For Life. "If you want a rider for abortion you can still get it, but for the vast majority of Kansans who don't want to pay for abortions, and don't want it as part of their health insurance, now they can have that taken out of there."

The House approved the measure 86-30 on Friday morning, sending it to Governor Sam Brownback. The Senate passed it Thursday night, 28-10. House members' action came only hours after they had blocked its passage. The House voted 70-51 early Friday morning against the measure, but it later reconsidered and launched another debate.

The anti-abortion language is bundled with other insurance regulatory changes in a single bill. House members initially objected, not over the abortion language, but over other insurance proposals.

Governor Brownback is expected to sign it into law.


Share
11 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

kochanowski - 5/16/2011 10:36 AM
0 Votes
I pay out of my own pocket for my PRIVATE health insurance. I do NOT think that my insurance premiums should go up to provide this coverage just because a woman is not responsible enough to pay the $10 a month for birth control. I believe in a woman's right to choose, but I also COMPLETELY agree with the government's intervention on this bill. If you aren't going to be responsible enough to take birth control, then you should have to pay out of your own pocket for your irresponsible actions. Period.

retireddiva - 5/15/2011 6:18 PM
0 Votes
So government control of health insurance is only ok when the Republicans want it? This is PRIVATE health insurance.

RealPerson - 5/14/2011 10:36 AM
0 Votes
mikeb242 I suggest your read the article. It is NOT about for or against Abortion. It is about who should pay for it. Again, I am not one for telling private insurance companies what they can or can NOT do. Even if Passed it does not say the will NOT be covered it says it just is not Automatic. Several of these people are low income, but they still can go pay $500 for a TV, PS3, Xbox, Drugs, Alcohol. There still is currently the sliding scale of planned parenthood.

mikeb242 - 5/13/2011 9:24 PM
0 Votes
I am not a fan of abortion at all, but you people are sitting round here talking like these are rich well-to-do people. Most of the people that have an abortion are poor or under the age of 18. How many of you that are dead set against abortion have adopted any kids? There are thousands of kids that need adopted. How many more do you think there will be if these people have to have the babies they don’t want? These babies are not wanted by their parents. They will not be taken care of properly and you will be supporting a lot of them because they will be on welfare. Then when they get older you can pay for them to live in prison.

kandib111 - 5/13/2011 6:12 PM
0 Votes
Unless the life of the woman is threatened or the pregnancy is due to rape, abortions should be elective surgery (the same as plastic surgery) and not be eligible for private or governmental health insurance coverage.

kandib111 - 5/13/2011 6:10 PM
0 Votes
Unless the woman's life is at stake, abortions should be treated the same as elective surgery (the same as plastic surgery) and should not be covered by private or governmental health insurance.

RealPerson - 5/13/2011 4:19 PM
0 Votes
MENES777- Yep people use the back alley to scare people. I am NOT for telling private insurance companies what to do. But also, it only cost around $500 for an abortion, come on these people pay more for a TV.

menes777 - 5/13/2011 1:56 PM
1 Vote
asp316 - Ask people to be responsible for their actions??? That's crazy talk. :P I think when the term "Back Alley abortion" is used it's meant to refer to how things will be and how people will react. Where as your point is how people should be. Of course people should be sexually responsible both before and after. Yet it's people we are talking about here. Stopping insurance payments for abortions may ease the minds of the pro-life movement, but in reality it isn't going to stop abortions. It's only going to push them away from legitimate providers. As nice it would be to get people to actually take the higher ground more often than not they usually take the other route. I think if anything would help it wouldn't be to discourage abortions, it would be to encourage adoption and help young women build self esteem so they don't end up in the predicaments in the first place. Education and alternatives are the key here, not more restrictions.

RealPerson - 5/13/2011 12:20 PM
1 Vote
I do not believe in abortions, unless for the mothers life, or done within first few weeks (we all make mistakes) BUT This goes way to far!

asp316 - 5/13/2011 12:08 PM
1 Vote
The pro choice movement certainly has milked the 'shady back alley abortion' line. If you have the responsibility to get pregnant, you have the responsibility to not murder the person created inside of you(yes, scientific proof is readily available which is why these laws are now coming to fruition). Rather than lashing out and hurting others, including the little baby you helped create, take responsibility for your actions. Don't make a second mistake by committing abortion.
KSN News Poll
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.