rss Email Wireless
 

Kansas rail service expansion still on track

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 9/02/2010 10:41 pm
WICHITA, Kansas – A plan to expand passenger rail service in Kansas is moving full speed ahead and now light is being shed upon the two options the state will be studying.

Supporters say the push to expand passenger train service through Wichita seems to be right on track. The Kansas Department of Transportation presented four options for expanding service at a number of public meetings across the state and has now narrowed them down to two that will be studied in depth.


The first would be to expand the Heartland Flyer, which currently runs from Ft. Worth to Oklahoma City through Wichita, to Newton. The route is the cheapest with $156 million in start up costs and would require a $3.2 million operating subsidy. But it will travel through Kansas in the middle of the night, leaving Newton at 4:30 a.m.

The other option would be to put two new trains on the tacks – one would leave Kansas City at 7 a.m. and the other would eave Ft. Worth at the same time. They would both arrive at the opposite destination at around 7:30 p.m. Start up costs would run about $479 million with a $6.1 million operating subsidy.

Those who have been pushing for expanded rail service, however, argue with very little additional cost, the state could benefit from both options.

"With the combination of one and three, we think the ridership would actually be greater than the sum of the two together,” said Deborah Fischer Stout with the Northern Flyer Alliance.

If supporters get their way and both plans are adopted, a passenger train would stop in Wichita four times a day – possible at the Old Town Union Station.

“So it would benefit business travelers as well as families and individuals that are tourists,” said Stout.

Still, it’s the costs that could derail the project. Federal dollars could pay for as much as 80 percent. But once an alternative is selected, state legislators in Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas would have to pay the rest.
Share
3 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

marc6850 - 9/3/2010 11:21 AM
0 Votes
How does creating a new passenger train service between Kansas City and Ft. Worth, Tx. cost $479 million - nearly a half billion dollars to start-up? Are these people crazy? has anyone bothered to talk to the BNSF or UP to see what they would propose in start-up costs to operate such a service? As for the BNSF downgrading a portion of their railroad to 60 mph and creating a problem for Amtrak: isn't Amtrak a customer or user of this railroad segment and don't they have the ability to invest in track maintenance for this route?

PassRailKS - 9/3/2010 9:59 AM
1 Vote
It is vitally important that KDOT speed completion of its Service Development Plan before July 31, 2011. If it is not finished before, or by that date, there is a great likelihood that High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail program (HSIPR) federal funding will not be an option. The next round of federal grant applications will likely be due just after July of next year. Another challenge for Kansas citizens is to pressure KDOT to kick off an environmental "NEPA" study. KDOT has waffled on the need for such a study, but it is a requirement for federal grant approval through the HSIPR program. Absent of this study, the "North Flyer" project could also be shelved. It is good however that the Kansas Passenger Rail Development Act, SB409, was passed last year. The rail route hosting the Southwest Chief through Newton was just downgraded to 60MPH by the BNSF Railway. Kansas could and should provide some funding to keep the Southwest Chief on its present routing. A reroute of the Southwest Chief through Oklahoma and the Texas Panhandle would likely make a stop in Wichita, but this stop would be around 2:00am east and 4:00am west. The danger is that it would bypass Garden City, Dodge City, and Hutchinson that have had uninterrupted passenger rail service since the late 1800’s. It would also eliminate the possibility of Kansas City - Pueblo - Colo. Spring - Denver Amtrak expansion proposed by Passenger Rail Kansas. It is less expensive to maintain existing rail infrastructure than to repair it once it reaches a degraded state. Evan Stair Executive Director Passenger Rail Kansas www.PassengerRailKS.org

PassRailKS - 9/3/2010 9:55 AM
1 Vote
It is vitally important that KDOT speed completion of its Service Development Plan before July 31, 2011. If it is not finished before, or by that date, there is a great likelihood that federal funding will not be an option. The next round of federal grant applications will likely be due just after July of next year. Another challenge is for Kansas citizens is to pressure KDOT to kick off an environmental "NEPA" study. KDOT has waffled on the need for such a study, but it is a requirement for federal grant approval through the High Speed-Intercity Passenger Rail program. Absent of this study, the "North Flyer" project could also be shelved. It is good however that the Kansas Passenger Rail Development Act was passed last year in the legislature. The rail route hosting the Southwest Chief through Newton was just downgraded to 60MPH by the BNSF Railway. This could mean a reroute of the Southwest Chief through Oklahoma and the Texas Panhandle. While it would likely make a stop in Wichita this would be around 2:00am east and 4:00am west. The danger is that it would bypass Garden City, Dodge City, and Hutchinson. It would also eliminate the possibility of Kansas City - Pueblo - Colo. Spring - Denver passenger rail expansion proposed by Passenger Rail Kansas. It is less expensive to maintain existing rail infrastructure than to repair it once it reaches a degraded state. Evan Stair Executive Director Passenger Rail Kansas www.PassengerRailKS.org
KSN News Poll
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.