rss Email Wireless
 

Opponents of new abortion bill argue it infringes on women's rights

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 3/30/2011 6:10 pm
TOPEKA, Kansas – The state’s two previous governors rejected bills that would further regulate abortion, but Governor Sam Brownback is now expected to sign them in to law. Wednesday, first-round approval was given to a bill that would further regulate abortion clinics in Kansas. Tuesday, two abortion pills landed on the governor’s desk. One restricts abortions after the 21st week because of pain to the fetus; the other requires two parents to give written consent for a minor. But opponents say the legislation is tampering with women’s rights.

Anti-abortion advocates have been fighting for abortion bills since the beginning of the legislative session. Now pro-life supporters are celebrating the passage of two abortion bills that now await the Governor’s signature.


“They are two very good bills that were crafted to be constitutionally correct,” said Melinda Craft with Kansans for Life.

But one bill is drawing strong criticism from the pro-choice side that requires minors seeking an abortion to get written consent from two parents.

“This puts a whole new dynamic at place in that situation, which many teens will not be comfortable with,” said Kari Ann Rinker with Kansas National Organization for Women.

Rinker says the bill is troubling and will only make matters worse for minors seeking abortion.

"What is does is slow the entire process for a teen seeking abortion care when during desperate times when a teenager should need expedient confidential medical attention,” she said.


Kansas will join Mississippi and North Dakota as the only states with laws requiring written consent from both parents. Supporters of the bill say it will essentially decrease abortions.

“Teenagers in a situation will be more considerate, more careful with their decisions,” said Melinda Craft with Kansans for Life. “They will be better educated on the consequences of abortions.”

Rinker, however, says the bill is nothing more than poor public policy at a time when other issues are more important.


Share
9 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

xpprosp3 - 3/31/2011 12:42 PM
Brownback is taking care of state business that no one else has had the guts to do.

wichita mom - 3/31/2011 12:31 PM
OK, Ms. Rinker, you can devote more time to your new lost cause... robbing the taxpayers to support illegals

51gopher - 3/30/2011 10:04 PM
Actually abortion can be considered health care, either on a mental level or a physical level whether you like to accept it or not. If you believe that it is murder then don't get an unwanted pregnancy. Also don't then go to the state to have it take care of your disabled baby, because you can't. If you really care about the babies how many have you adopted? Especially the disabled and special needs ones? How do you propose that we pay for these babies that are going to be on welfare many times? How do you plan on the women still getting an education when many of them stuck on welfare or a low paying job while trying to raise a baby? Sorry, but in some cases and in line with the woman's beliefs I have little problem with abortion, although I do believe that in the third trimester it should be on a very limited basis and also the woman should be made aware of the alternatives.

1Cor1311 - 3/30/2011 9:52 PM
Abortion is not health care, and thus should not be considered under the constitutional covering. They always talk about the rights of women. What about the rights of the fetus? When a fetus is diagnosed with a life-threatening disability, doctors have successfully performed surgeries to help the baby - this is health care. Why is it heroic on one hand to save an infant's life this way, and yet humanly acceptable for another "doctor" to vacuum-suck out the life of many healthy children. I wonder if they took a poll on women who had abortions, how many of them regret it. And for those who want to debate when life really begins...I have one question: when did you become human? Was it at conception or birth? Or have you reached "life" yet?

classyLady - 3/30/2011 9:25 PM
TWO parents to sign off on a minor getting an abortion?!? TWO parents?!?? So, then minors in need of an abortion who have one dead parent aren't eligible for the same kind of healthcare that a minor with two alive parents would have? Has the KS legislature completely ignored the constitution with this one? Limiting access to healthcare based on the number of available parents an individual has? Surely this isn't correct. I'm wondering if KSN got the story wrong or is writing it in an ambiguous way. Having ONE parent's consent would be far more reasonable that requiring TWO parents' consent. If the story is correct as is, then it sounds like the KS legislature is making it unreasonably difficult for a minor to get an abortion by requiring TWO parents to consent to it. It's almost as if the legislature KNOWS how difficult (and in some cases IMPOSSIBLE) it will be for a minor to even HAVE TWO living parents, let alone get their consent, and because they are fundamentally opposed to abortion in general, they are making the requirements unreasonably difficult and in some cases impossible for a minor to obtain. Shame on you, KS legislature! This sounds very similar to some of the high-profile cases in the last few years of people who's religion bars them from obtaining certain medical care kept their minor children from receiving the level of healthcare they needed. And as I recall in at least one case, the court system got involved to compel the parents to allow their child to have access to the needed medical care. Access to ob-gyn healthcare for a pregnant female minor should be no different. Minors should be allowed access to the same medical procedures available to someone who's of legal age. This bill seems ripe for legal challenges... Now, if only we had an attorney general who's anti-abortion agenda wasn't so similar to that of former A.G. Phil Kline's.........

iheartusa - 3/30/2011 9:21 PM
The bill still allows for judicial bypass to be used by a judge, just like there currently is...so, podunkboy, that is what happens in the cases you mentioned.

podunkboy - 3/30/2011 9:07 PM
so...and what happens if the minor has one known, living parent, or, god forbid, one of her parents is the fetus's father (I'm talking mostly about SE Kansas...)? And if minor can't give consent for sexual activity or determine what happens to their own body, where does the fetus-daddy come into things? Why not just make it where the governor himself has to sign off on everything...

ictdude - 3/30/2011 8:55 PM
The act of murder (which is what abortion is), IS NOT A RIGHT!

51gopher - 3/30/2011 7:48 PM
Guess the GOP only has concerns about the gov getting involved with personal stuff when it comes to morals. I don't think that the requirement for both parents is justified myself, but let's let the moral squads make sure that we live in their world.
KSN News Poll
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.